Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCKTX vs RBNTX
FCKTX vs RBNTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCKTX vs. RBNTX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCKTX is a Hold and RBNTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCKTX (17.4B) and RBNTX (17.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCKTX pays higher dividends than RBNTX: FCKTX (1.06) vs RBNTX (0.17). FCKTX was incepted earlier than RBNTX: FCKTX (9 years) vs RBNTX (10 years). RBNTX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FCKTX (0.39). FCKTX (5.00) and RBNTX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. RBNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCKTX: RBNTX (250) vs FCKTX (1000000). FCKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.07 vs. RBNTX (14.69). FCKTX return over 5 years is better than : 48.85 vs. RBNTX (42.74).
| FCKTX | RBNTX | FCKTX / RBNTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.48 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.48 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.948 | 12.248 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.4B | 17.4B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.17 | 639% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.07 | 14.69 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.68 | 36.02 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.85 | 42.74 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.89 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers