Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLSX vs RHGTX
FCLSX vs RHGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLSX vs. RHGTX commentary
Jun 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLSX is a Hold and RHGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHGTX has more cash in the bank: 46.7B vs. FCLSX (69.1M). FCLSX pays higher dividends than RHGTX: FCLSX (2.13) vs RHGTX (1.39). FCLSX was incepted earlier than RHGTX: FCLSX (8 years) vs RHGTX (10 years). RHGTX (0.50) is less costly to investors than FCLSX (0.00). FCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RHGTX (6.00). FCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHGTX: FCLSX (0) vs RHGTX (250). RHGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.42 vs. FCLSX (6.96). FCLSX return over 5 years is better than : 50.61 vs. RHGTX (43.92).
| FCLSX | RHGTX | FCLSX / RHGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.221 | 6.490 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.1M | 46.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 1.39 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.96 | 9.42 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.52 | 32.88 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.61 | 43.92 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers