Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLSX vs RHGTX
FCLSX vs RHGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLSX vs. RHGTX commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLSX is a Hold and RHGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHGTX has more cash in the bank: 46.1B vs. FCLSX (69.1M). FCLSX pays higher dividends than RHGTX: FCLSX (2.13) vs RHGTX (1.39). FCLSX was incepted earlier than RHGTX: FCLSX (8 years) vs RHGTX (10 years). RHGTX (0.50) is less costly to investors than FCLSX (0.01). FCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RHGTX (6.00). FCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHGTX: FCLSX (0) vs RHGTX (250). RHGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.29 vs. FCLSX (7.57). FCLSX return over 5 years is better than : 47.93 vs. RHGTX (42.31).
| FCLSX | RHGTX | FCLSX / RHGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.50 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.50 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.827 | 6.096 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.1M | 46.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 1.39 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.57 | 11.29 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.33 | 25.81 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.93 | 42.31 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement