Ad is loading...
FCLSX vs RHGTX
FCLSX vs RHGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLSX vs. RHGTX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLSX is a Hold and RHGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHGTX has more cash in the bank: 44.2B vs. FCLSX (66.8M). FCLSX pays higher dividends than RHGTX: FCLSX (2.17) vs RHGTX (1.46). FCLSX was incepted earlier than RHGTX: FCLSX (8 years) vs RHGTX (9 years). RHGTX (0.50) is less costly to investors than FCLSX (0.01). FCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RHGTX (6.00). FCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHGTX: FCLSX (0) vs RHGTX (250). RHGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.26 vs. FCLSX (5.69). FCLSX return over 5 years is better than : 55.76 vs. RHGTX (44.80).
| FCLSX | RHGTX | FCLSX / RHGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.50 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.50 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.124 | 1.475 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 66.8M | 44.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.17 | 1.46 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.69 | 7.26 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.54 | 25.58 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.76 | 44.80 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers