Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLTX vs RYPAX
FCLTX vs RYPAX Comparison
Open Charts FCLTX vs RYPAX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials M
Price$50.95
Change-$0.14 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets759.97M
FCLTX vs RYPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLTX vs. RYPAX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLTX is a Buy and RYPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLTX has more cash in the bank: 760M vs. RYPAX (6.43M). RYPAX pays higher dividends than FCLTX: RYPAX (0.57) vs FCLTX (0.00). FCLTX was incepted earlier than RYPAX: FCLTX (29 years) vs RYPAX (27 years). RYPAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FCLTX (1.23). RYPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 207.00 vs. FCLTX (29.00). FCLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYPAX: FCLTX (0) vs RYPAX (2500). FCLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.40 vs. RYPAX (6.51). FCLTX return over 5 years is better than : 62.40 vs. RYPAX (16.58).
| FCLTX | RYPAX | FCLTX / RYPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.65 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.68 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.421 | -0.371 | -4,701% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 760M | 6.43M | 11,827% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.57 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.40 | 6.51 | 375% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.06 | 0.09 | 75,543% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.40 | 16.58 | 376% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.67 | 18.41 | 221% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement