Ad is loading...
FCLTX vs RYPAX ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
FCLTX vs RYPAX Comparison
Open Charts FCLTX vs RYPAX
Fidelity Advisor® Industrials M
Price$38.23
Change+$0.29 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Rydex Transportation H
Price$48.71
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLTX vs RYPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FCLTX vs. RYPAX commentary
Dec 09, 2023
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLTX is a Hold and RYPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLTX has more cash in the bank: 464M vs. RYPAX (13.4M). FCLTX (0.00) and RYPAX (0.00) have matching dividends . FCLTX was incepted earlier than RYPAX: FCLTX (27 years) vs RYPAX (26 years). RYPAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FCLTX (1.29). FCLTX (189.00) and RYPAX (185.00) have comparable annual turnover. FCLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYPAX: FCLTX (0) vs RYPAX (2500). RYPAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FCLTX: RYPAX (1000) vs FCLTX (500). FCLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.72 vs. RYPAX (-2.56). FCLTX return over 5 years is better than : 26.81 vs. RYPAX (18.80).
| FCLTX | RYPAX | FCLTX / RYPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.64 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.64 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.413 | 18.863 | 87% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 464M | 13.4M | 3,463% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.72 | -2.56 | -458% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.24 | -26.28 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.81 | 18.80 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.73 | 53.86 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers