Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLTX vs RYPAX
FCLTX vs RYPAX Comparison
Open Charts FCLTX vs RYPAX
FCLTX vs RYPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLTX vs. RYPAX commentary
Jun 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLTX is a Hold and RYPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLTX has more cash in the bank: 2.02B vs. RYPAX (6.68M). RYPAX pays higher dividends than FCLTX: RYPAX (0.05) vs FCLTX (0.00). FCLTX was incepted earlier than RYPAX: FCLTX (30 years) vs RYPAX (28 years). RYPAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FCLTX (1.23). RYPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FCLTX (29.00). FCLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYPAX: FCLTX (0) vs RYPAX (2500). FCLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.55 vs. RYPAX (23.61). FCLTX return over 5 years is better than : 40.40 vs. RYPAX (-18.43).
| FCLTX | RYPAX | FCLTX / RYPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.64 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.69 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.989 | 9.883 | 152% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.02B | 6.68M | 30,206% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.55 | 23.61 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.60 | 28.52 | 283% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.40 | -18.43 | -219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.65 | 52.83 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement