Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCMAX vs JCSRX
FCMAX vs JCSRX Comparison
Open Charts FCMAX vs JCSRX
Fidelity Advisor California Muni Inc A
Price$11.91
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.76B
JHancock CA Municipal Bond R6
Price$9.52
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets517.78M
FCMAX vs JCSRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCMAX vs. JCSRX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCMAX is a Hold and JCSRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCMAX has more cash in the bank: 1.76B vs. JCSRX (518M). JCSRX pays higher dividends than FCMAX: JCSRX (3.86) vs FCMAX (2.58). FCMAX was incepted earlier than JCSRX: FCMAX (23 years) vs JCSRX (8 years). FCMAX (0.76) is less costly to investors than JCSRX (0.69). JCSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FCMAX (22.00). FCMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JCSRX: FCMAX (0) vs JCSRX (1000000). FCMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.37 vs. JCSRX (-2.00). JCSRX return over 5 years is better than : 4.26 vs. FCMAX (0.55).
| FCMAX | JCSRX | FCMAX / JCSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.52 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.69 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.173 | -3.636 | 32% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.76B | 518M | 339% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.58 | 3.86 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.37 | -2.00 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.30 | 8.89 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.55 | 4.26 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers