Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCMAX vs MCAVX
FCMAX vs MCAVX Comparison
Open Charts FCMAX vs MCAVX
Fidelity Advisor California Muni Inc A
Price$11.94
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.76B
MFS CA Municipal Bond I
Price$8.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets686.72M
FCMAX vs MCAVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCMAX vs. MCAVX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCMAX is a Hold and MCAVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCMAX has more cash in the bank: 1.76B vs. MCAVX (687M). MCAVX pays higher dividends than FCMAX: MCAVX (3.66) vs FCMAX (2.58). FCMAX was incepted earlier than MCAVX: FCMAX (23 years) vs MCAVX (9 years). FCMAX (0.76) is less costly to investors than MCAVX (0.61). FCMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. MCAVX (10.00). FCMAX (0) and MCAVX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.96 vs. MCAVX (-0.85). MCAVX return over 5 years is better than : 1.93 vs. FCMAX (0.73).
| FCMAX | MCAVX | FCMAX / MCAVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.60 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.61 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.924 | -2.536 | 36% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.76B | 687M | 256% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.58 | 3.66 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.96 | -0.85 | -112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.94 | 7.75 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.73 | 1.93 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers