Ad is loading...
FCMAX vs MCAVX
FCMAX vs MCAVX Comparison
Open Charts FCMAX vs MCAVX
Fidelity Advisor California Muni Inc A
Price$11.89
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.62B
MFS CA Municipal Bond I
Price$8.80
Change+$0.04 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets680.88M
FCMAX vs MCAVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCMAX vs. MCAVX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCMAX is a Hold and MCAVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCMAX has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. MCAVX (681M). MCAVX pays higher dividends than FCMAX: MCAVX (3.56) vs FCMAX (2.53). FCMAX was incepted earlier than MCAVX: FCMAX (23 years) vs MCAVX (9 years). FCMAX (0.76) is less costly to investors than MCAVX (0.61). MCAVX (23.00) and FCMAX (22.00) have comparable annual turnover. FCMAX (0) and MCAVX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.26 vs. MCAVX (1.13). MCAVX return over 5 years is better than : 7.10 vs. FCMAX (3.73).
| FCMAX | MCAVX | FCMAX / MCAVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.60 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.61 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.856 | -2.577 | 72% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.62B | 681M | 238% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 3.56 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.26 | 1.13 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.88 | 5.02 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.73 | 7.10 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...