Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCMAX vs MSCCX
FCMAX vs MSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FCMAX vs MSCCX
Fidelity Advisor California Muni Inc A
Price$11.91
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.76B
NYLI MacKay California Muni
Price$9.33
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
FCMAX vs MSCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCMAX vs. MSCCX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCMAX is a Hold and MSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCMAX has more cash in the bank: 1.76B vs. MSCCX (1.24B). MSCCX pays higher dividends than FCMAX: MSCCX (3.32) vs FCMAX (2.58). FCMAX was incepted earlier than MSCCX: FCMAX (23 years) vs MSCCX (12 years). MSCCX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FCMAX (0.76). MSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FCMAX (22.00). FCMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSCCX: FCMAX (0) vs MSCCX (2500). FCMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.45 vs. MSCCX (-1.39). FCMAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.64 vs. MSCCX (-1.04).
| FCMAX | MSCCX | FCMAX / MSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.03 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.04 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.090 | -2.643 | 41% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.76B | 1.24B | 141% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.58 | 3.32 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.45 | -1.39 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.39 | 9.02 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.64 | -1.04 | -61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.81 | 19.37 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement