Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCMAX vs NCHAX
FCMAX vs NCHAX Comparison
Open Charts FCMAX vs NCHAX
Fidelity Advisor California Muni Inc A
Price$11.93
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.76B
Nuveen CA High Yield Municipal Bond A
Price$7.54
Change+$0.01 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets914.46M
FCMAX vs NCHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCMAX vs. NCHAX commentary
Jun 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCMAX is a Hold and NCHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCMAX has more cash in the bank: 1.76B vs. NCHAX (914M). NCHAX pays higher dividends than FCMAX: NCHAX (4.42) vs FCMAX (2.58). FCMAX was incepted earlier than NCHAX: FCMAX (23 years) vs NCHAX (19 years). NCHAX (1.83) is less costly to investors than FCMAX (0.76). FCMAX (22.00) and NCHAX (22.00) have comparable annual turnover. NCHAX (4%) and FCMAX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FCMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NCHAX: FCMAX (0) vs NCHAX (2500). FCMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.54 vs. NCHAX (-2.09). FCMAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.64 vs. NCHAX (-6.21).
| FCMAX | NCHAX | FCMAX / NCHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.83 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.83 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.090 | -3.649 | 30% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 95% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.76B | 914M | 192% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.58 | 4.42 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.54 | -2.09 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.66 | 4.04 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.64 | -6.21 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.08 | 8.87 | 204% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement