Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCMAX vs TCCAX
FCMAX vs TCCAX Comparison
Open Charts FCMAX vs TCCAX
Fidelity Advisor California Muni Inc A
Price$11.91
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.76B
JHancock CA Municipal Bond C
Price$9.51
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets517.78M
FCMAX vs TCCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCMAX vs. TCCAX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCMAX is a Hold and TCCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCMAX has more cash in the bank: 1.76B vs. TCCAX (518M). TCCAX pays higher dividends than FCMAX: TCCAX (2.86) vs FCMAX (2.58). FCMAX was incepted earlier than TCCAX: FCMAX (23 years) vs TCCAX (26 years). TCCAX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FCMAX (0.76). TCCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FCMAX (22.00). FCMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCCAX: FCMAX (0) vs TCCAX (1000). FCMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.37 vs. TCCAX (-2.94). FCMAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.55 vs. TCCAX (-0.52).
| FCMAX | TCCAX | FCMAX / TCCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.49 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.76 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.173 | -4.029 | 29% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.76B | 518M | 339% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.58 | 2.86 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.37 | -2.94 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.30 | 5.88 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.55 | -0.52 | -106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.71 | 12.69 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers