Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCMAX vs TCCAX
FCMAX vs TCCAX Comparison
Open Charts FCMAX vs TCCAX
Fidelity Advisor California Muni Inc A
Price$11.85
Change-$0.03 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.68B
JHancock CA Municipal Bond C
Price$9.48
Change-$0.05 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets519.09M
FCMAX vs TCCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCMAX vs. TCCAX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCMAX is a Hold and TCCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCMAX has more cash in the bank: 1.68B vs. TCCAX (519M). TCCAX pays higher dividends than FCMAX: TCCAX (2.79) vs FCMAX (2.56). FCMAX was incepted earlier than TCCAX: FCMAX (23 years) vs TCCAX (26 years). TCCAX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FCMAX (0.76). TCCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FCMAX (22.00). FCMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCCAX: FCMAX (0) vs TCCAX (1000). FCMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.02 vs. TCCAX (-1.61). FCMAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.11 vs. TCCAX (1.02).
| FCMAX | TCCAX | FCMAX / TCCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.49 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.76 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.643 | -4.075 | 40% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.68B | 519M | 324% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.56 | 2.79 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.02 | -1.61 | -63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.53 | 4.38 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.11 | 1.02 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.36 | 12.82 | 135% |