FCMGF
Price
$8.55
Change
+$0.37 (+4.52%)
Updated
May 7 closing price
Capitalization
291.91M
MGRC
Price
$112.98
Change
-$0.50 (-0.44%)
Updated
May 23, 02:06 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.02B
62 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCMGF vs MGRC

Header iconFCMGF vs MGRC Comparison
Open Charts FCMGF vs MGRCBanner chart's image
Firm Capital Mortgage Investment
Price$8.55
Change+$0.37 (+4.52%)
Volume$2.4K
Capitalization291.91M
McGrath Rent
Price$112.98
Change-$0.50 (-0.44%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.02B
FCMGF vs MGRC Comparison Chart
Loading...
MGRC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCMGF vs. MGRC commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCMGF is a Hold and MGRC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (FCMGF: $8.55 vs. MGRC: $113.48)
Brand notoriety: FCMGF and MGRC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCMGF: 236% vs. MGRC: 0%
Market capitalization -- FCMGF: $291.91M vs. MGRC: $3.02B
FCMGF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $291.91M. MGRC’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $3.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCMGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGRC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCMGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGRC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCMGF is a better buy in the long-term than MGRC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGRC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MGRC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

FCMGF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MGRC (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -1.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

MGRC is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.14% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGRC($3.02B) has a higher market cap than FCMGF($292M). MGRC has higher P/E ratio than FCMGF: MGRC (26.49) vs FCMGF (11.58). MGRC YTD gains are higher at: 2.357 vs. FCMGF (1.484). FCMGF has less debt than MGRC: FCMGF (183M) vs MGRC (763M). MGRC has higher revenues than FCMGF: MGRC (832M) vs FCMGF (50.5M).
FCMGFMGRCFCMGF / MGRC
Capitalization292M3.02B10%
EBITDAN/A299M-
Gain YTD1.4842.35763%
P/E Ratio11.5826.4944%
Revenue50.5M832M6%
Total CashN/A877K-
Total Debt183M763M24%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCMGF vs MGRC: Fundamental Ratings
FCMGF
MGRC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4819
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8616
SMR RATING
1..100
1740
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4954
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3693
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
12n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGRC's Valuation (83) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCMGF (99) in the null industry. This means that MGRC’s stock grew similarly to FCMGF’s over the last 12 months.

MGRC's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for FCMGF (86) in the null industry. This means that MGRC’s stock grew significantly faster than FCMGF’s over the last 12 months.

FCMGF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as MGRC (40) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FCMGF’s stock grew similarly to MGRC’s over the last 12 months.

FCMGF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as MGRC (54) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FCMGF’s stock grew similarly to MGRC’s over the last 12 months.

FCMGF's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGRC (93) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FCMGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGRC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGRC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGRC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ICHR16.730.11
+0.66%
Ichor Holdings
COLM64.750.30
+0.47%
Columbia Sportswear Company
NEM52.650.01
+0.02%
Newmont Corp
TLS2.48N/A
N/A
Telos Corp
FEMY1.01N/A
N/A
Femasys

FCMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCMGF and BRLGF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCMGF and BRLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCMGF
1D Price
Change %
FCMGF100%
N/A
BRLGF - FCMGF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGRC - FCMGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASHTY - FCMGF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
TBCRF - FCMGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AL - FCMGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MGRC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGRC has been loosely correlated with WSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MGRC jumps, then WSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGRC
1D Price
Change %
MGRC100%
N/A
WSC - MGRC
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
R - MGRC
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
COF - MGRC
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
URI - MGRC
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
ENVA - MGRC
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
More