Ad is loading...
FCNAX vs FSHOX
FCNAX vs FSHOX Comparison
Open Charts FCNAX vs FSHOX
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Discret A
Price$44.47
Change+$2.48 (+5.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets444.94M
Fidelity Select Construction & Housing
Price$118.55
Change+$4.22 (+3.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets704.88M
FCNAX vs FSHOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNAX vs. FSHOX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNAX is a Buy and FSHOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSHOX has more cash in the bank: 705M vs. FCNAX (445M). FSHOX pays higher dividends than FCNAX: FSHOX (0.74) vs FCNAX (0.00). FCNAX was incepted earlier than FSHOX: FCNAX (29 years) vs FSHOX (39 years). FCNAX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FSHOX (0.71). FSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FCNAX (25.00). FCNAX (0) and FSHOX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.89 vs. FSHOX (-1.60). FSHOX return over 5 years is better than : 146.08 vs. FCNAX (52.36).
| FCNAX | FSHOX | FCNAX / FSHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.71 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.71 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.982 | -3.949 | 278% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 445M | 705M | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.74 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.89 | -1.60 | -56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.90 | 44.11 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.36 | 146.08 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.93 | 101.69 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...