FCNCP vs SHFS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNCP is a Hold and SHFS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FCNCP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FCNCP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SHFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FCNCP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FCNCP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SHFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FCNCP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -5.17% price change this week, while SHFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -43.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
SHFS is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-3.56% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| FCNCP | SHFS | FCNCP / SHFS | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 53.1M | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.245 | -72.685 | 10% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 3.43 | - |
| Revenue | 8.78B | -27.72M | -31,665% |
| Total Cash | 908M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 37.6B | 15.5M | 242,581% |
| FCNCP | SHFS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 34% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 29% | 1 day ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 32% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 32% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 32% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 33% | 1 day ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
FCNCP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCNCP has been loosely correlated with FCNCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCNCP jumps, then FCNCO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCNCP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCNCP | 100% | -2.30% | ||
| FCNCO - FCNCP | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| HBANP - FCNCP | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| OZKAP - FCNCP | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| FITBO - FCNCP | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| KEY - FCNCP | 50% Loosely correlated | -12.13% | ||
More | ||||
SHFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SHFS and UMBF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHFS and UMBF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHFS | 100% | -21.66% | ||
| UMBF - SHFS | 25% Poorly correlated | -9.58% | ||
| FCNCP - SHFS | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.30% | ||
| FBP - SHFS | 23% Poorly correlated | -7.75% | ||
| FLG - SHFS | 22% Poorly correlated | -5.76% | ||
| MFG - SHFS | 22% Poorly correlated | -8.82% | ||
More | ||||