Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNTX vs FSKAX
FCNTX vs FSKAX Comparison
Open Charts FCNTX vs FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index
Price$164.75
Change+$1.73 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.88B
FCNTX vs FSKAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNTX vs. FSKAX commentary
Jun 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNTX is a Buy and FSKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNTX has more cash in the bank: 157B vs. FSKAX (106B). FSKAX pays higher dividends than FCNTX: FSKAX (1.09) vs FCNTX (0.06). FCNTX was incepted earlier than FSKAX: FCNTX (58 years) vs FSKAX (14 years). FCNTX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FSKAX (0.01). FCNTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FSKAX (3.00). FCNTX (0) and FSKAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCNTX (13.77) and FSKAX (13.60) have marching annual gain over last year. FSKAX return over 5 years is better than : 96.43 vs. FCNTX (55.29).
| FCNTX | FSKAX | FCNTX / FSKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.01 | 4,200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.01 | 4,200% |
| Fund Existence | 58 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.895 | 2.235 | 309% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 157B | 106B | 148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 1.09 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.77 | 13.60 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.93 | 48.12 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.29 | 96.43 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.39 | 215.49 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement