Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNTX vs FSKAX
FCNTX vs FSKAX Comparison
Open Charts FCNTX vs FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index
Price$173.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.51B
FCNTX vs FSKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNTX vs. FSKAX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNTX is a Buy and FSKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNTX has more cash in the bank: 167B vs. FSKAX (112B). FSKAX pays higher dividends than FCNTX: FSKAX (1.03) vs FCNTX (0.05). FCNTX was incepted earlier than FSKAX: FCNTX (58 years) vs FSKAX (14 years). FCNTX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FSKAX (0.01). FCNTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FSKAX (3.00). FCNTX (0) and FSKAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.29 vs. FSKAX (14.00). FSKAX return over 5 years is better than : 104.15 vs. FCNTX (52.29).
| FCNTX | FSKAX | FCNTX / FSKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.01 | 4,200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.01 | 4,200% |
| Fund Existence | 58 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.412 | 7.485 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 167B | 112B | 149% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 1.03 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.29 | 14.00 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.27 | 69.43 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.29 | 104.15 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.56 | 224.90 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement