Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCOM vs IYZ
FCOM vs IYZ Comparison
Open Charts FCOM vs IYZ
Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF
Price$61.61
Change-$0.61 (-0.98%)
Volume$119K
Net Assets1.54B
iShares US Telecommunications ETF
Price$28.22
Change-$0.40 (-1.40%)
Volume$1.14M
Net Assets389.4M
FCOM vs IYZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCOM vs. IYZ commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Hold and IYZ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCOM has more net assets: 1.54B vs. IYZ (389M). IYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than FCOM: IYZ (5.841) vs FCOM (5.212). FCOM was incepted earlier than IYZ: FCOM (12 years) vs IYZ (25 years). FCOM (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than IYZ (0.40). IYZ has a higher turnover FCOM (21.00) vs FCOM (21.00).
| FCOM | IYZ | FCOM / IYZ | |
| Gain YTD | 5.212 | 5.841 | 89% |
| Net Assets | 1.54B | 389M | 397% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.40 | 21% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 30.00 | 70% |
| Yield | 0.90 | 1.94 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCOM | IYZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 12 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 10 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with GOOGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then GOOGL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | -0.98% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 79% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| META - FCOM | 77% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| MSGS - FCOM | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| ROKU - FCOM | 63% Loosely correlated | -3.05% | ||
More | ||||
IYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYZ has been closely correlated with CMCSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYZ jumps, then CMCSA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IYZ | 100% | -1.40% | ||
| CMCSA - IYZ | 71% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| LITE - IYZ | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.55% | ||
| CIEN - IYZ | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.66% | ||
| CSCO - IYZ | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| CHTR - IYZ | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.06% | ||
More | ||||