Ad is loading...
FCOM vs IYZ
FCOM vs IYZ Comparison
Open Charts FCOM vs IYZ
Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF
Price$54.80
Change+$1.09 (+2.03%)
Volume$207.21K
Net Assets1.32B
iShares US Telecommunications ETF
Price$26.07
Change+$0.36 (+1.40%)
Volume$214.96K
Net Assets347.46M
FCOM vs IYZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCOM vs. IYZ commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Buy and IYZ is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCOM has more net assets: 1.32B vs. IYZ (347M). IYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than FCOM: IYZ (-2.223) vs FCOM (-6.417). FCOM was incepted earlier than IYZ: FCOM (12 years) vs IYZ (25 years). FCOM (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than IYZ (0.40). IYZ has a higher turnover FCOM (21.00) vs FCOM (21.00).
| FCOM | IYZ | FCOM / IYZ | |
| Gain YTD | -6.417 | -2.223 | 289% |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 347M | 380% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.40 | 21% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 30.00 | 70% |
| Yield | 0.96 | 1.99 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCOM | IYZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 78% | 22 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with GOOGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then GOOGL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | +2.03% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 81% Closely correlated | +2.53% | ||
| META - FCOM | 77% Closely correlated | +2.48% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 76% Closely correlated | +2.38% | ||
| MSGS - FCOM | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| LLYVK - FCOM | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
More | ||||
IYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYZ has been closely correlated with CMCSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYZ jumps, then CMCSA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IYZ | 100% | +1.40% | ||
| CMCSA - IYZ | 71% Closely correlated | -3.71% | ||
| CIEN - IYZ | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.72% | ||
| LITE - IYZ | 64% Loosely correlated | +6.53% | ||
| CHTR - IYZ | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| CSCO - IYZ | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.19% | ||
More | ||||