Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCPVX vs SSGSX
FCPVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FCPVX vs SSGSX
Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund
Price$20.37
Change+$0.13 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.4B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.29
Change+$0.15 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.38B
FCPVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCPVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCPVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.38B vs. FCPVX (4.4B). FCPVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FCPVX (0.57) vs SSGSX (0.50). FCPVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FCPVX (21 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FCPVX (0.97). FCPVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). FCPVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: FCPVX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). FCPVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.49 vs. SSGSX (-6.25). FCPVX return over 5 years is better than : 58.55 vs. SSGSX (14.49).
| FCPVX | SSGSX | FCPVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.26 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.26 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.049 | -4.609 | -1% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.4B | 5.38B | 82% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.50 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.49 | -6.25 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.44 | -7.04 | -77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.55 | 14.49 | 404% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.69 | 13.13 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement