Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCQAX vs FIJBX
FCQAX vs FIJBX Comparison
Open Charts FCQAX vs FIJBX
Franklin CA High Yield Municipal A
Price$9.33
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.91B
Fidelity Advisor California Muni Inc Z
Price$11.86
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.77B
FCQAX vs FIJBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCQAX vs. FIJBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCQAX is a Hold and FIJBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCQAX has more cash in the bank: 2.91B vs. FIJBX (1.77B). FCQAX pays higher dividends than FIJBX: FCQAX (4.13) vs FIJBX (2.95). FCQAX was incepted earlier than FIJBX: FCQAX (7 years) vs FIJBX (7 years). FCQAX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FIJBX (0.40). FIJBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FCQAX (10.33). FIJBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCQAX: FIJBX (0) vs FCQAX (1000). FIJBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.08 vs. FCQAX (-2.10). FIJBX return over 5 years is better than : 0.50 vs. FCQAX (-4.79).
| FCQAX | FIJBX | FCQAX / FIJBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.40 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.40 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.313 | -1.275 | 260% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 1.77B | 165% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.13 | 2.95 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.10 | -0.08 | 2,496% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.45 | 5.88 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.79 | 0.50 | -966% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement