Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCQAX vs FIJBX
FCQAX vs FIJBX Comparison
Open Charts FCQAX vs FIJBX
Franklin CA High Yield Municipal A
Price$9.46
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.93B
Fidelity Advisor California Muni Inc Z
Price$11.91
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.76B
FCQAX vs FIJBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCQAX vs. FIJBX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCQAX is a Hold and FIJBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCQAX has more cash in the bank: 2.93B vs. FIJBX (1.76B). FCQAX pays higher dividends than FIJBX: FCQAX (4.12) vs FIJBX (2.95). FCQAX was incepted earlier than FIJBX: FCQAX (7 years) vs FIJBX (7 years). FCQAX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FIJBX (0.40). FIJBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FCQAX (10.33). FIJBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCQAX: FIJBX (0) vs FCQAX (1000). FIJBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.73 vs. FCQAX (-0.87). FIJBX return over 5 years is better than : 2.10 vs. FCQAX (-2.21).
| FCQAX | FIJBX | FCQAX / FIJBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.40 | 210% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.40 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.298 | -1.105 | 208% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.93B | 1.76B | 167% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.12 | 2.95 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.87 | 0.73 | -119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.17 | 9.16 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.21 | 2.10 | -105% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement