Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCQAX vs JCSRX
FCQAX vs JCSRX Comparison
Open Charts FCQAX vs JCSRX
Franklin CA High Yield Municipal A
Price$9.46
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.93B
JHancock CA Municipal Bond R6
Price$9.52
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets517.78M
FCQAX vs JCSRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCQAX vs. JCSRX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCQAX is a Hold and JCSRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCQAX has more cash in the bank: 2.93B vs. JCSRX (518M). FCQAX pays higher dividends than JCSRX: FCQAX (4.12) vs JCSRX (3.86). FCQAX was incepted earlier than JCSRX: FCQAX (7 years) vs JCSRX (8 years). FCQAX (0.84) is less costly to investors than JCSRX (0.69). JCSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FCQAX (10.33). FCQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JCSRX: FCQAX (1000) vs JCSRX (1000000). FCQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.87 vs. JCSRX (-2.00). JCSRX return over 5 years is better than : 4.26 vs. FCQAX (-2.21).
| FCQAX | JCSRX | FCQAX / JCSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.52 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.69 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.298 | -3.636 | 63% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.93B | 518M | 565% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.12 | 3.86 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.87 | -2.00 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.17 | 8.89 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.21 | 4.26 | -52% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement