Ad is loading...
FCQAX vs JCSRX
FCQAX vs JCSRX Comparison
Open Charts FCQAX vs JCSRX
Franklin CA High Yield Municipal A
Price$9.54
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.93B
JHancock CA Municipal Bond R6
Price$9.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets524.69M
FCQAX vs JCSRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCQAX vs. JCSRX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCQAX is a Hold and JCSRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCQAX has more cash in the bank: 2.93B vs. JCSRX (525M). FCQAX pays higher dividends than JCSRX: FCQAX (4.08) vs JCSRX (3.78). FCQAX was incepted earlier than JCSRX: FCQAX (7 years) vs JCSRX (8 years). FCQAX (0.84) is less costly to investors than JCSRX (0.69). JCSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FCQAX (10.93). FCQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JCSRX: FCQAX (1000) vs JCSRX (1000000). FCQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.28 vs. JCSRX (-0.42). JCSRX return over 5 years is better than : 8.61 vs. FCQAX (1.89).
| FCQAX | JCSRX | FCQAX / JCSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.52 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.69 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.736 | -2.754 | 63% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.93B | 525M | 558% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.08 | 3.78 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.28 | -0.42 | -308% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.44 | 7.93 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.89 | 8.61 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |