Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCQAX vs JCSRX
FCQAX vs JCSRX Comparison
Open Charts FCQAX vs JCSRX
Franklin CA High Yield Municipal A
Price$9.33
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.91B
JHancock CA Municipal Bond R6
Price$9.35
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets510.83M
FCQAX vs JCSRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCQAX vs. JCSRX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCQAX is a Hold and JCSRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCQAX has more cash in the bank: 2.91B vs. JCSRX (511M). FCQAX pays higher dividends than JCSRX: FCQAX (4.13) vs JCSRX (3.89). FCQAX was incepted earlier than JCSRX: FCQAX (7 years) vs JCSRX (8 years). FCQAX (0.80) is less costly to investors than JCSRX (0.69). JCSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FCQAX (10.33). FCQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JCSRX: FCQAX (1000) vs JCSRX (1000000). FCQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.10 vs. JCSRX (-3.80). JCSRX return over 5 years is better than : 1.25 vs. FCQAX (-4.79).
| FCQAX | JCSRX | FCQAX / JCSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.52 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.69 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.313 | -5.031 | 66% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 511M | 570% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.13 | 3.89 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.10 | -3.80 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.45 | 3.48 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.79 | 1.25 | -382% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement