Ad is loading...
FCQAX vs MSCVX
FCQAX vs MSCVX Comparison
Open Charts FCQAX vs MSCVX
Franklin CA High Yield Municipal A
Price$9.50
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.91B
NYLI MacKay California Muni Investor Cl
Price$9.35
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
FCQAX vs MSCVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCQAX vs. MSCVX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCQAX is a Hold and MSCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCQAX has more cash in the bank: 2.91B vs. MSCVX (1.24B). FCQAX pays higher dividends than MSCVX: FCQAX (4.00) vs MSCVX (3.54). FCQAX was incepted earlier than MSCVX: FCQAX (7 years) vs MSCVX (12 years). FCQAX (0.84) is less costly to investors than MSCVX (0.79). MSCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FCQAX (10.93). FCQAX initial investment is less costly to investors than MSCVX (3%) vs MSCVX (3%). FCQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSCVX: FCQAX (1000) vs MSCVX (2500). FCQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.98 vs. MSCVX (0.53). MSCVX return over 5 years is better than : 3.56 vs. FCQAX (1.29).
| FCQAX | MSCVX | FCQAX / MSCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.78 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.79 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.590 | -2.898 | 89% |
| Front Load | 4% | 3% | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 1.24B | 234% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.00 | 3.54 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.98 | 0.53 | 376% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.91 | 6.58 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.29 | 3.56 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 21.49 | - |