Ad is loading...
FCQAX vs NCHAX
FCQAX vs NCHAX Comparison
Open Charts FCQAX vs NCHAX
Franklin CA High Yield Municipal A
Price$9.50
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.93B
Nuveen CA High Yield Municipal Bond A
Price$7.56
Change-$0.02 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets945.14M
FCQAX vs NCHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCQAX vs. NCHAX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCQAX is a Hold and NCHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCQAX has more cash in the bank: 2.93B vs. NCHAX (945M). NCHAX pays higher dividends than FCQAX: NCHAX (4.34) vs FCQAX (4.08). FCQAX was incepted earlier than NCHAX: FCQAX (7 years) vs NCHAX (19 years). NCHAX (1.83) is less costly to investors than FCQAX (0.84). NCHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FCQAX (10.33). NCHAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FCQAX (4%) vs FCQAX (4%). FCQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NCHAX: FCQAX (1000) vs NCHAX (2500). FCQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.07 vs. NCHAX (0.53). FCQAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.09 vs. NCHAX (-1.45).
| FCQAX | NCHAX | FCQAX / NCHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.83 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.83 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.044 | -3.377 | 61% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 89% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.93B | 945M | 310% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.08 | 4.34 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.07 | 0.53 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.95 | 3.21 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.09 | -1.45 | -75% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 7.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...