Ad is loading...
FCQAX vs SHRSX
FCQAX vs SHRSX Comparison
Open Charts FCQAX vs SHRSX
Franklin CA High Yield Municipal A
Price$9.47
Change+$0.04 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.89B
Western Asset California Municipals IS
Price$13.52
Change+$0.05 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.24M
FCQAX vs SHRSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCQAX vs. SHRSX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCQAX is a Hold and SHRSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCQAX has more cash in the bank: 2.89B vs. SHRSX (213M). FCQAX pays higher dividends than SHRSX: FCQAX (4.00) vs SHRSX (3.28). FCQAX was incepted earlier than SHRSX: FCQAX (7 years) vs SHRSX (6 years). FCQAX (0.84) is less costly to investors than SHRSX (0.54). FCQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.93 vs. SHRSX (4.00). FCQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHRSX: FCQAX (1000) vs SHRSX (1000000). FCQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.92 vs. SHRSX (0.25). SHRSX return over 5 years is better than : 1.64 vs. FCQAX (0.54).
| FCQAX | SHRSX | FCQAX / SHRSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.52 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.54 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.307 | -2.847 | 116% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.89B | 213M | 1,357% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.00 | 3.28 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.92 | 0.25 | 373% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.06 | 4.03 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.54 | 1.64 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |