FCREY
Price
$2.97
Change
+$0.02 (+0.68%)
Updated
Jan 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.69B
HCMLY
Price
$19.09
Change
+$0.35 (+1.87%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
39.08B
Ad is loading...

FCREY vs HCMLY

Header iconFCREY vs HCMLY Comparison
Open Charts FCREY vs HCMLYBanner chart's image
Fletcher Building
Price$2.97
Change+$0.02 (+0.68%)
Volume$410
Capitalization2.69B
HOLCIM
Price$19.09
Change+$0.35 (+1.87%)
Volume$144.21K
Capitalization39.08B
FCREY vs HCMLY Comparison Chart
Loading...
FCREY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCMLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCREY vs. HCMLY commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCREY is a Hold and HCMLY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FCREY: $2.97 vs. HCMLY: $19.08)
Brand notoriety: FCREY and HCMLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCREY: 20% vs. HCMLY: 153%
Market capitalization -- FCREY: $2.69B vs. HCMLY: $39.08B
FCREY [@Construction Materials] is valued at $2.69B. HCMLY’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $39.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCREY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHCMLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FCREY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HCMLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HCMLY is a better buy in the long-term than FCREY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCREY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCMLY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCREY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • HCMLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HCMLY is a better buy in the short-term than FCREY.

Price Growth

FCREY (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HCMLY (@Construction Materials) price change was -0.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+1.68% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCMLY($39.1B) has a higher market cap than FCREY($2.69B). FCREY has higher P/E ratio than HCMLY: FCREY (13.40) vs HCMLY (10.41). FCREY YTD gains are higher at: 0.678 vs. HCMLY (-0.339). HCMLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.78B vs. FCREY (1B). HCMLY has higher revenues than FCREY: HCMLY (27.6B) vs FCREY (8.72B).
FCREYHCMLYFCREY / HCMLY
Capitalization2.69B39.1B7%
EBITDA1B7.78B13%
Gain YTD0.678-0.339-200%
P/E Ratio13.4010.41129%
Revenue8.72B27.6B32%
Total CashN/A3.65B-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCREY vs HCMLY: Fundamental Ratings
FCREY
HCMLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10010
SMR RATING
1..100
9798
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6350
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7745
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCREY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as HCMLY (11). This means that FCREY’s stock grew similarly to HCMLY’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FCREY (100). This means that HCMLY’s stock grew significantly faster than FCREY’s over the last 12 months.

FCREY's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as HCMLY (98). This means that FCREY’s stock grew similarly to HCMLY’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as FCREY (63). This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to FCREY’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as FCREY (77). This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to FCREY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCREYHCMLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
45%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FCREY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCMLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSPIX40.690.37
+0.92%
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core Instl
PMYTX44.040.40
+0.92%
Putnam Core Equity Fund R6
TMCLX9.530.06
+0.63%
Transamerica Energy Infrastructure C
GSRAX11.500.07
+0.61%
Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Gr A
VKSEX10.590.03
+0.28%
Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Value C

FCREY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCREY and JHX have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCREY and JHX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCREY
1D Price
Change %
FCREY100%
N/A
JHX - FCREY
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
HCMLY - FCREY
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
CTXXF - FCREY
13%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
HDLMY - FCREY
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.39%
FRCEF - FCREY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HCMLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCMLY has been closely correlated with HDLMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HCMLY jumps, then HDLMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCMLY
1D Price
Change %
HCMLY100%
+1.90%
HDLMY - HCMLY
67%
Closely correlated
+2.39%
CRH - HCMLY
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
SUM - HCMLY
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EXP - HCMLY
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
VMC - HCMLY
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
More