Ad is loading...
FCSSX vs PCLPX
FCSSX vs PCLPX Comparison
Open Charts FCSSX vs PCLPX
Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy
Price$90.33
Change-$0.83 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets580.07M
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS® Strategy I2
Price$6.25
Change-$0.07 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.68B
FCSSX vs PCLPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSSX vs. PCLPX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSSX is a Hold and PCLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCLPX has more cash in the bank: 4.68B vs. FCSSX (580M). FCSSX pays higher dividends than PCLPX: FCSSX (11.70) vs PCLPX (8.18). FCSSX was incepted earlier than PCLPX: FCSSX (16 years) vs PCLPX (15 years). PCLPX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FCSSX (0.00). PCLPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 224.00 vs. FCSSX (0.00). FCSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLPX: FCSSX (0) vs PCLPX (1000000). FCSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.62 vs. PCLPX (-4.60). PCLPX return over 5 years is better than : 193.57 vs. FCSSX (98.01).
| FCSSX | PCLPX | FCSSX / PCLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.93 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.10 | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.803 | -1.948 | -298% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 580M | 4.68B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 11.70 | 8.18 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.62 | -4.60 | -101% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.95 | -2.28 | 305% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.01 | 193.57 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.63 | 62.19 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers