Ad is loading...
FCSSX vs PCLPX
FCSSX vs PCLPX Comparison
Open Charts FCSSX vs PCLPX
Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy
Price$86.96
Change+$0.06 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS® Strategy I2
Price$6.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSSX vs PCLPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FCSSX vs. PCLPX commentary
Oct 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSSX is a Hold and PCLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCLPX has more cash in the bank: 4.36B vs. FCSSX (583M). FCSSX pays higher dividends than PCLPX: FCSSX (4.44) vs PCLPX (2.32). FCSSX was incepted earlier than PCLPX: FCSSX (15 years) vs PCLPX (14 years). FCSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLPX: FCSSX (0) vs PCLPX (1000000). PCLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.16 vs. FCSSX (-1.34). PCLPX return over 5 years is better than : 81.70 vs. FCSSX (43.32).
| FCSSX | PCLPX | FCSSX / PCLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.838 | 6.405 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 583M | 4.36B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.44 | 2.32 | 192% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.34 | 1.16 | -116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.78 | 26.17 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.32 | 81.70 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.30 | 36.99 | -17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers