Ad is loading...
FCSZX vs PCNTX
FCSZX vs PCNTX Comparison
Open Charts FCSZX vs PCNTX
Franklin Convertible Securities Adv
Price$22.31
Change+$0.08 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.67B
Putnam Convertible Securities R6
Price$24.86
Change+$0.11 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets478.78M
FCSZX vs PCNTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSZX vs. PCNTX commentary
Apr 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSZX is a Sell and PCNTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSZX has more cash in the bank: 2.67B vs. PCNTX (479M). PCNTX pays higher dividends than FCSZX: PCNTX (2.34) vs FCSZX (1.55). FCSZX was incepted earlier than PCNTX: FCSZX (17 years) vs PCNTX (7 years). PCNTX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FCSZX (0.58). PCNTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FCSZX (37.31). PCNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCSZX: PCNTX (0) vs FCSZX (100000). PCNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.82 vs. FCSZX (8.31). FCSZX return over 5 years is better than : 13.20 vs. PCNTX (11.08).
| FCSZX | PCNTX | FCSZX / PCNTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.72 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.72 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.031 | -2.728 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 479M | 557% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 2.34 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.31 | 9.82 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.03 | 11.46 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.20 | 11.08 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.71 | N/A | - |