Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCTFX vs FKTFX
FCTFX vs FKTFX Comparison
Open Charts FCTFX vs FKTFX
Fidelity California Municipal Income
Price$11.93
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.75B
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A1
Price$6.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.54B
FCTFX vs FKTFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCTFX vs. FKTFX commentary
Aug 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCTFX is a Hold and FKTFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTFX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. FCTFX (1.75B). FKTFX pays higher dividends than FCTFX: FKTFX (3.80) vs FCTFX (2.95). FCTFX was incepted earlier than FKTFX: FCTFX (41 years) vs FKTFX (49 years). FKTFX (0.60) is less costly to investors than FCTFX (0.43). FCTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FKTFX (7.96). FCTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKTFX: FCTFX (0) vs FKTFX (1000). FCTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.09 vs. FKTFX (-2.10). FCTFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.29 vs. FKTFX (-5.18).
| FCTFX | FKTFX | FCTFX / FKTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.60 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.60 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 49 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.199 | -2.124 | 9% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.75B | 12.5B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.95 | 3.80 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.09 | -2.10 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.57 | 3.67 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.29 | -5.18 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.12 | 2.61 | 811% |