FCX
Price
$41.48
Change
-$0.20 (-0.48%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
67.89B
41 days until earnings call
LAC
Price
$2.70
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.14B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCX vs LAC

Header iconFCX vs LAC Comparison
Open Charts FCX vs LACBanner chart's image
Freeport-McMoran
Price$41.48
Change-$0.20 (-0.48%)
Volume$82.68K
Capitalization67.89B
Lithium Americas
Price$2.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$28.47K
Capitalization1.14B
FCX vs LAC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FCX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCX vs. LAC commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCX is a Buy and LAC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FCX: $41.69 vs. LAC: $2.70)
Brand notoriety: FCX: Notable vs. LAC: Not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCX: 105% vs. LAC: 74%
Market capitalization -- FCX: $67.89B vs. LAC: $1.14B
FCX [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $67.89B. LAC’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLAC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCX is a better buy in the long-term than LAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCX’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LAC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCX is a better buy in the short-term than LAC.

Price Growth

FCX (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +6.82% price change this week, while LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -1.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCX is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

LAC is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.71% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCX($67.9B) has a higher market cap than LAC($1.14B). FCX YTD gains are higher at: 10.388 vs. LAC (-9.091). FCX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.59B vs. LAC (-3.27M). FCX has more cash in the bank: 4.76B vs. LAC (196M). LAC has less debt than FCX: LAC (3.11M) vs FCX (9.85B). FCX has higher revenues than LAC: FCX (22.9B) vs LAC (0).
FCXLACFCX / LAC
Capitalization67.9B1.14B5,935%
EBITDA8.59B-3.27M-262,580%
Gain YTD10.388-9.091-114%
P/E Ratio36.98N/A-
Revenue22.9B0-
Total Cash4.76B196M2,428%
Total Debt9.85B3.11M316,511%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCX vs LAC: Fundamental Ratings
FCX
LAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1961
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31100
SMR RATING
1..100
6780
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5081
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LAC's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCX (73) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCX’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for LAC (100) in the null industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew significantly faster than LAC’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's SMR Rating (67) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as LAC (80) in the null industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as LAC (81) in the null industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as LAC (100) in the null industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCXLAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBSRX49.89N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Inv
BFTHX58.99N/A
N/A
Baron Fifth Avenue Growth Retail
FRNKX16.76N/A
N/A
Frank Value Inv
SCURX28.88N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps SDR
OAYLX79.43N/A
N/A
Oakmark Select Advisor

FCX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCX has been closely correlated with TECK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCX jumps, then TECK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCX
1D Price
Change %
FCX100%
+2.03%
TECK - FCX
90%
Closely correlated
+3.57%
SCCO - FCX
90%
Closely correlated
+2.49%
HBM - FCX
83%
Closely correlated
+2.13%
LUNMF - FCX
79%
Closely correlated
+3.12%
ERO - FCX
76%
Closely correlated
N/A
More