FCX
Price
$45.80
Change
+$0.03 (+0.07%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
67.89B
18 days until earnings call
MJDLF
Price
$6.68
Change
-$0.09 (-1.33%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
595.69M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCX vs MJDLF

Header iconFCX vs MJDLF Comparison
Open Charts FCX vs MJDLFBanner chart's image
Freeport-McMoran
Price$45.80
Change+$0.03 (+0.07%)
Volume$7.61M
Capitalization67.89B
Major Drilling Group International
Price$6.68
Change-$0.09 (-1.33%)
Volume$2.8K
Capitalization595.69M
FCX vs MJDLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FCX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MJDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCX vs. MJDLF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCX is a Buy and MJDLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FCX: $45.80 vs. MJDLF: $6.68)
Brand notoriety: FCX: Notable vs. MJDLF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCX: 66% vs. MJDLF: 21%
Market capitalization -- FCX: $67.89B vs. MJDLF: $595.69M
FCX [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $67.89B. MJDLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $595.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMJDLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MJDLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MJDLF is a better buy in the long-term than FCX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MJDLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MJDLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCX is a better buy in the short-term than MJDLF.

Price Growth

FCX (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +3.01% price change this week, while MJDLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCX is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCX($67.9B) has a higher market cap than MJDLF($596M). FCX has higher P/E ratio than MJDLF: FCX (36.98) vs MJDLF (10.27). FCX YTD gains are higher at: 21.270 vs. MJDLF (18.021). FCX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.59B vs. MJDLF (146M). FCX has more cash in the bank: 4.76B vs. MJDLF (94.4M). MJDLF has less debt than FCX: MJDLF (25.6M) vs FCX (9.85B). FCX has higher revenues than MJDLF: FCX (22.9B) vs MJDLF (736M).
FCXMJDLFFCX / MJDLF
Capitalization67.9B596M11,393%
EBITDA8.59B146M5,883%
Gain YTD21.27018.021118%
P/E Ratio36.9810.27360%
Revenue22.9B736M3,111%
Total Cash4.76B94.4M5,040%
Total Debt9.85B25.6M38,488%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCX vs MJDLF: Fundamental Ratings
FCX
MJDLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7283
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3051
SMR RATING
1..100
6882
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4243
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7410
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a44

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MJDLF's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as FCX (81) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that MJDLF’s stock grew similarly to FCX’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MJDLF (51) in the null industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew similarly to MJDLF’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's SMR Rating (68) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MJDLF (82) in the null industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew similarly to MJDLF’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MJDLF (43) in the null industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew similarly to MJDLF’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCX (74) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that MJDLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCXMJDLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MJDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MODL43.500.38
+0.89%
VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF
DFEM30.060.18
+0.60%
Dimensional Emerging Markets Cr Eq 2 ETF
CIF1.75N/A
N/A
MFS Intermediate High Income Fund
XCNY25.99N/A
N/A
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
XES66.54-0.33
-0.49%
SPDR® S&P Oil & Gas Equipment&Svcs ETF

FCX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCX has been closely correlated with SCCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCX jumps, then SCCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCX
1D Price
Change %
FCX100%
+0.07%
SCCO - FCX
90%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
TECK - FCX
90%
Closely correlated
-2.13%
HBM - FCX
83%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
LUNMF - FCX
79%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
ERO - FCX
77%
Closely correlated
-2.81%
More

MJDLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MJDLF has been loosely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MJDLF jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MJDLF
1D Price
Change %
MJDLF100%
-1.33%
FCX - MJDLF
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
HBM - MJDLF
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
LUNMF - MJDLF
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
CSCCF - MJDLF
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
SCCO - MJDLF
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
More