FCX
Price
$29.15
Change
-$4.36 (-13.01%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
67.89B
18 days until earnings call
NBYCF
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
5.3M
Ad is loading...

FCX vs NBYCF

Header iconFCX vs NBYCF Comparison
Open Charts FCX vs NBYCFBanner chart's image
Freeport-McMoran
Price$29.15
Change-$4.36 (-13.01%)
Volume$44.73M
Capitalization67.89B
Niobay Metals
Price$0.05
Change+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Volume$1.58K
Capitalization5.3M
FCX vs NBYCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FCX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCX vs. NBYCF commentary
Apr 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCX is a Hold and NBYCF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FCX: $29.15 vs. NBYCF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: FCX: Notable vs. NBYCF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCX: 258% vs. NBYCF: 10%
Market capitalization -- FCX: $67.89B vs. NBYCF: $5.3M
FCX [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $67.89B. NBYCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $5.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNBYCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FCX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NBYCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCX is a better buy in the long-term than NBYCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FCX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

FCX (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -24.13% price change this week, while NBYCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +13.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -5.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCX is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-5.65% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCX($67.9B) has a higher market cap than NBYCF($5.3M). FCX has higher P/E ratio than NBYCF: FCX (36.98) vs NBYCF (34.84). NBYCF YTD gains are higher at: 27.322 vs. FCX (-23.159). FCX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.59B vs. NBYCF (-4.43M). FCX has more cash in the bank: 4.76B vs. NBYCF (4M). NBYCF has less debt than FCX: NBYCF (48.2K) vs FCX (9.85B). FCX has higher revenues than NBYCF: FCX (22.9B) vs NBYCF (0).
FCXNBYCFFCX / NBYCF
Capitalization67.9B5.3M1,280,407%
EBITDA8.59B-4.43M-193,920%
Gain YTD-23.15927.322-85%
P/E Ratio36.9834.84106%
Revenue22.9B0-
Total Cash4.76B4M118,861%
Total Debt9.85B48.2K20,441,909%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCX vs NBYCF: Fundamental Ratings
FCX
NBYCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
39100
SMR RATING
1..100
6494
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8641
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCX's Valuation (19) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NBYCF (74) in the null industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew somewhat faster than NBYCF’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NBYCF (100) in the null industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew somewhat faster than NBYCF’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's SMR Rating (64) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NBYCF (94) in the null industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew similarly to NBYCF’s over the last 12 months.

NBYCF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FCX (65) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that NBYCF’s stock grew similarly to FCX’s over the last 12 months.

NBYCF's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCX (86) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that NBYCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FCX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYVFX8.12-0.25
-2.99%
Royce Small-Cap Value Service
PSKCX37.28-2.01
-5.12%
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth C
CTCSX29.19-1.65
-5.35%
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth C
AMRMX51.67-3.06
-5.59%
American Funds American Mutual A
FSGAX38.20-2.48
-6.10%
Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Adv

NBYCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NBYCF and RIO have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBYCF and RIO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBYCF
1D Price
Change %
NBYCF100%
+15.06%
RIO - NBYCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.44%
BHP - NBYCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-9.49%
SCCO - NBYCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-9.62%
VALE - NBYCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.68%
FCX - NBYCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-13.01%
More