FCX
Price
$37.35
Change
-$0.28 (-0.74%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
67.89B
82 days until earnings call
PGEZF
Price
$0.13
Change
+$0.01 (+8.33%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
29.75M
Ad is loading...

FCX vs PGEZF

Header iconFCX vs PGEZF Comparison
Open Charts FCX vs PGEZFBanner chart's image
Freeport-McMoran
Price$37.35
Change-$0.28 (-0.74%)
Volume$10.96M
Capitalization67.89B
STILLWATER CRITICAL MINERALS
Price$0.13
Change+$0.01 (+8.33%)
Volume$225.86K
Capitalization29.75M
FCX vs PGEZF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FCX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGEZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCX vs. PGEZF commentary
Apr 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCX is a StrongBuy and PGEZF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FCX: $37.35 vs. PGEZF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: FCX: Notable vs. PGEZF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCX: 56% vs. PGEZF: 82%
Market capitalization -- FCX: $67.89B vs. PGEZF: $29.75M
FCX [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $67.89B. PGEZF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $29.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePGEZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FCX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PGEZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCX is a better buy in the long-term than PGEZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGEZF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PGEZF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PGEZF is a better buy in the short-term than FCX.

Price Growth

FCX (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +13.53% price change this week, while PGEZF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +11.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCX is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.82% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCX($67.9B) has a higher market cap than PGEZF($29.7M). PGEZF YTD gains are higher at: 50.623 vs. FCX (-1.104). FCX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.59B vs. PGEZF (-4.58M). FCX has more cash in the bank: 4.76B vs. PGEZF (504K). PGEZF has less debt than FCX: PGEZF (50K) vs FCX (9.85B). FCX has higher revenues than PGEZF: FCX (22.9B) vs PGEZF (0).
FCXPGEZFFCX / PGEZF
Capitalization67.9B29.7M228,620%
EBITDA8.59B-4.58M-187,478%
Gain YTD-1.10450.623-2%
P/E Ratio36.98N/A-
Revenue22.9B0-
Total Cash4.76B504K944,048%
Total Debt9.85B50K19,706,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCX vs PGEZF: Fundamental Ratings
FCX
PGEZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1575
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3189
SMR RATING
1..100
6595
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6238
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7297
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCX's Valuation (19) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for PGEZF (99) in the null industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew significantly faster than PGEZF’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGEZF (89) in the null industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGEZF’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's SMR Rating (65) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PGEZF (95) in the null industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew similarly to PGEZF’s over the last 12 months.

PGEZF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as FCX (62) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that PGEZF’s stock grew similarly to FCX’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PGEZF (97) in the null industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew similarly to PGEZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCXPGEZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FCX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGEZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STEM0.420.01
+2.16%
Stem
MLNK16.710.09
+0.54%
MeridianLink
CTAS208.40-1.35
-0.64%
Cintas Corp
WKEY3.77-0.08
-2.08%
WISeKey International Holding Ltd
SRPT60.44-1.32
-2.14%
Sarepta Therapeutics

FCX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCX has been closely correlated with SCCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCX jumps, then SCCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCX
1D Price
Change %
FCX100%
-0.74%
SCCO - FCX
90%
Closely correlated
-1.62%
TECK - FCX
89%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
HBM - FCX
82%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
LUNMF - FCX
79%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
ERO - FCX
77%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
More

PGEZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGEZF and SLVDF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGEZF and SLVDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGEZF
1D Price
Change %
PGEZF100%
+8.57%
SLVDF - PGEZF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
LUNMF - PGEZF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
OMZNF - PGEZF
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.19%
FCX - PGEZF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
CSCCF - PGEZF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
More