FCX
Price
$46.73
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 28 closing price
85 days until earnings call
PLL
Price
$13.64
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 28 closing price
3 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FCX vs PLL

Header iconFCX vs PLL Comparison
Open Charts FCX vs PLLBanner chart's image
Freeport-McMoran
Price$46.73
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.45M
CapitalizationN/A
Piedmont Lithium
Price$13.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.32M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FCX vs PLL Comparison Chart
Loading...
FCX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
PLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
FCX vs. PLL commentary
Oct 30, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCX is a StrongBuy and PLL is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 30, 2024
Stock price -- (FCX: $46.73 vs. PLL: $13.64)
Brand notoriety: FCX: Notable vs. PLL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCX: 56% vs. PLL: 144%
Market capitalization -- FCX: $67.89B vs. PLL: $256.53M
FCX [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $67.89B. PLL’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $256.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCX’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePLL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCX is a better buy in the long-term than PLL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PLL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PLL is a better buy in the short-term than FCX.

Price Growth

FCX (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.52% price change this week, while PLL (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +29.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCX is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

PLL is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCX($67.9B) has a higher market cap than PLL($257M). FCX YTD gains are higher at: 11.164 vs. PLL (-51.683). FCX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.59B vs. PLL (-18.36M). FCX has more cash in the bank: 4.76B vs. PLL (72.2M). PLL has less debt than FCX: PLL (1.57M) vs FCX (9.85B). FCX has higher revenues than PLL: FCX (22.9B) vs PLL (39.8M).
FCXPLLFCX / PLL
Capitalization67.9B257M26,420%
EBITDA8.59B-18.36M-46,781%
Gain YTD11.164-51.683-22%
P/E Ratio36.98N/A-
Revenue22.9B39.8M57,538%
Total Cash4.76B72.2M6,590%
Total Debt9.85B1.57M629,183%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCX vs PLL: Fundamental Ratings
FCX
PLL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5972
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2086
SMR RATING
1..100
6593
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
27100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCX's Valuation (16) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PLL (31) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew similarly to PLL’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for PLL (86) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew significantly faster than PLL’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's SMR Rating (65) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PLL (93) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew similarly to PLL’s over the last 12 months.

PLL's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as FCX (52) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew similarly to FCX’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for PLL (100) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew significantly faster than PLL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCXPLL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FCX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
PLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME22.732.16
+10.50%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X69907.7600001978.460900
+2.91%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL233.401.99
+0.86%
Apple
SPY580.831.79
+0.31%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA262.51-6.68
-2.48%
Tesla

FCX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCX has been closely correlated with SCCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCX jumps, then SCCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCX
1D Price
Change %
FCX100%
+0.28%
SCCO - FCX
90%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
HBM - FCX
83%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
LUNMF - FCX
79%
Closely correlated
-0.20%
GLNCY - FCX
76%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
TECK - FCX
75%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
More