FCX
Price
$41.72
Change
+$0.86 (+2.10%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
67.89B
41 days until earnings call
XPL
Price
$0.67
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
48.2M
69 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCX vs XPL

Header iconFCX vs XPL Comparison
Open Charts FCX vs XPLBanner chart's image
Freeport-McMoran
Price$41.72
Change+$0.86 (+2.10%)
Volume$91.87K
Capitalization67.89B
Solitario Resources
Price$0.67
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.46K
Capitalization48.2M
FCX vs XPL Comparison Chart
Loading...
FCX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCX vs. XPL commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCX is a Buy and XPL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FCX: $41.69 vs. XPL: $0.68)
Brand notoriety: FCX: Notable vs. XPL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCX: 105% vs. XPL: 169%
Market capitalization -- FCX: $67.89B vs. XPL: $48.2M
FCX [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $67.89B. XPL’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $48.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXPL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FCX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCX is a better buy in the long-term than XPL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCX’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XPL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • XPL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCX is a better buy in the short-term than XPL.

Price Growth

FCX (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +6.82% price change this week, while XPL (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +7.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCX is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

XPL is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.59% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCX($67.9B) has a higher market cap than XPL($48.2M). XPL YTD gains are higher at: 13.204 vs. FCX (10.388). FCX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.59B vs. XPL (-4.05M). FCX has more cash in the bank: 4.76B vs. XPL (9.67M). XPL has less debt than FCX: XPL (89K) vs FCX (9.85B). FCX has higher revenues than XPL: FCX (22.9B) vs XPL (0).
FCXXPLFCX / XPL
Capitalization67.9B48.2M140,871%
EBITDA8.59B-4.05M-212,126%
Gain YTD10.38813.20479%
P/E Ratio36.98N/A-
Revenue22.9B0-
Total Cash4.76B9.67M49,214%
Total Debt9.85B89K11,070,787%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCX vs XPL: Fundamental Ratings
FCX
XPL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1526
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3260
SMR RATING
1..100
6792
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5454
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

XPL's Valuation (51) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as FCX (69) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that XPL’s stock grew similarly to FCX’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as XPL (60) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew similarly to XPL’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's SMR Rating (67) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as XPL (92) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew similarly to XPL’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as XPL (54) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew similarly to XPL’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as XPL (100) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew similarly to XPL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCXXPL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GROW2.370.04
+1.72%
US Global Investors
BNS53.430.11
+0.21%
Bank of Nova Scotia
TENB32.55-0.19
-0.58%
Tenable Holdings
ARCB63.73-0.59
-0.92%
ArcBest Corp
AXGN10.90-0.46
-4.05%
Axogen

XPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XPL has been loosely correlated with TECK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XPL jumps, then TECK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XPL
1D Price
Change %
XPL100%
+2.86%
TECK - XPL
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
MTAL - XPL
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.56%
FCX - XPL
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.54%
SKE - XPL
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
HBM - XPL
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
More