Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDBTX vs NSFBX
FDBTX vs NSFBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDBTX vs. NSFBX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDBTX is a Hold and NSFBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDBTX has more cash in the bank: 4.81B vs. NSFBX (513K). NSFBX pays higher dividends than FDBTX: NSFBX (3.54) vs FDBTX (3.01). FDBTX was incepted earlier than NSFBX: FDBTX (8 years) vs NSFBX (8 years). NSFBX (3.52) is less costly to investors than FDBTX (0.30). NSFBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FDBTX (6.00). FDBTX (1000000) and NSFBX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FDBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.32 vs. NSFBX (-0.37). FDBTX return over 5 years is better than : 22.11 vs. NSFBX (-8.44).
| FDBTX | NSFBX | FDBTX / NSFBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.44 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 3.52 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.429 | 1.616 | 522% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.81B | 513K | 938,012% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.01 | 3.54 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.32 | -0.37 | -2,498% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.38 | 11.22 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.11 | -8.44 | -262% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement