Ad is loading...
FDBTX vs NSFBX
FDBTX vs NSFBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDBTX vs. NSFBX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDBTX is a Hold and NSFBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDBTX has more cash in the bank: 4.89B vs. NSFBX (4.24M). FDBTX pays higher dividends than NSFBX: FDBTX (2.97) vs NSFBX (2.45). FDBTX was incepted earlier than NSFBX: FDBTX (8 years) vs NSFBX (8 years). NSFBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FDBTX (7.00). FDBTX (1000000) and NSFBX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FDBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.12 vs. NSFBX (3.36). FDBTX return over 5 years is better than : 14.86 vs. NSFBX (-7.94).
| FDBTX | NSFBX | FDBTX / NSFBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.146 | 0.681 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.89B | 4.24M | 115,341% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 2.45 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.12 | 3.36 | 242% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.81 | -2.98 | -128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.86 | -7.94 | -187% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...