Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDBTX vs NSFBX
FDBTX vs NSFBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDBTX vs. NSFBX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDBTX is a Hold and NSFBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDBTX has more cash in the bank: 4.78B vs. NSFBX (3.46M). NSFBX pays higher dividends than FDBTX: NSFBX (3.61) vs FDBTX (3.09). FDBTX was incepted earlier than NSFBX: FDBTX (8 years) vs NSFBX (8 years). NSFBX (3.43) is less costly to investors than FDBTX (0.30). NSFBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FDBTX (6.00). FDBTX (1000000) and NSFBX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FDBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.26 vs. NSFBX (-1.04). FDBTX return over 5 years is better than : 19.89 vs. NSFBX (-8.73).
| FDBTX | NSFBX | FDBTX / NSFBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.50 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 3.43 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.401 | -0.369 | -1,462% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.78B | 3.46M | 138,117% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.09 | 3.61 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.26 | -1.04 | -792% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.31 | 6.72 | 213% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.89 | -8.73 | -228% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement