Ad is loading...
FDBTX vs RBJTX
FDBTX vs RBJTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDBTX vs. RBJTX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDBTX is a Hold and RBJTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDBTX (4.86B) and RBJTX (4.86B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FDBTX pays higher dividends than RBJTX: FDBTX (3.13) vs RBJTX (2.05). FDBTX was incepted earlier than RBJTX: FDBTX (8 years) vs RBJTX (18 years). RBJTX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FDBTX (0.30). RBJTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDBTX: RBJTX (250) vs FDBTX (1000000). FDBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.10 vs. RBJTX (4.92). FDBTX return over 5 years is better than : 25.58 vs. RBJTX (20.06).
| FDBTX | RBJTX | FDBTX / RBJTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.39 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.39 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.291 | 2.159 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.86B | 4.86B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.13 | 2.05 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.10 | 4.92 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.05 | 6.14 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.58 | 20.06 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 22.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...