Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDBTX vs RFJTX
FDBTX vs RFJTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDBTX vs. RFJTX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDBTX is a Hold and RFJTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDBTX (4.74B) and RFJTX (4.74B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FDBTX (3.15) and RFJTX (3.14) have matching dividends . FDBTX was incepted earlier than RFJTX: FDBTX (8 years) vs RFJTX (16 years). FDBTX (0.30) and RFJTX (0.30) have similar cost to investors . FDBTX (6.00) and RFJTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. RFJTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDBTX: RFJTX (250) vs FDBTX (1000000). RFJTX (7.00) and FDBTX (6.93) have marching annual gain over last year. RFJTX (23.45) and FDBTX (23.40) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FDBTX | RFJTX | FDBTX / RFJTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.30 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.30 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.682 | 3.673 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.74B | 4.74B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.15 | 3.14 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.93 | 7.00 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.85 | 13.91 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.40 | 23.45 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 29.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement