Ad is loading...
FDBTX vs RHBTX
FDBTX vs RHBTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDBTX vs. RHBTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDBTX is a Hold and RHBTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDBTX (4.74B) and RHBTX (4.74B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FDBTX (3.16) and RHBTX (3.01) have matching dividends . FDBTX was incepted earlier than RHBTX: FDBTX (8 years) vs RHBTX (9 years). RHBTX (0.44) is less costly to investors than FDBTX (0.30). RHBTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDBTX: RHBTX (250) vs FDBTX (1000000). FDBTX (7.42) and RHBTX (7.29) have marching annual gain over last year. FDBTX (21.72) and RHBTX (20.84) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FDBTX | RHBTX | FDBTX / RHBTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.44 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.44 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.455 | 2.385 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.74B | 4.74B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 3.01 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.42 | 7.29 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.94 | 11.55 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.72 | 20.84 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...