Ad is loading...
FDBTX vs TCNIX
FDBTX vs TCNIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDBTX vs. TCNIX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDBTX is a Hold and TCNIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDBTX has more cash in the bank: 4.76B vs. TCNIX (979M). TCNIX pays higher dividends than FDBTX: TCNIX (3.72) vs FDBTX (3.15). FDBTX was incepted earlier than TCNIX: FDBTX (8 years) vs TCNIX (18 years). TCNIX (0.53) is less costly to investors than FDBTX (0.30). TCNIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. FDBTX (6.00). FDBTX (1000000) and TCNIX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FDBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.93 vs. TCNIX (6.10). FDBTX return over 5 years is better than : 25.16 vs. TCNIX (17.41).
| FDBTX | TCNIX | FDBTX / TCNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.38 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.53 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.601 | 2.210 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.76B | 979M | 486% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.15 | 3.72 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.93 | 6.10 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.23 | 13.56 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.16 | 17.41 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...