Ad is loading...
FDCF vs IYZ
FDCF vs IYZ Comparison
Open Charts FDCF vs IYZ
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$38.98
Change+$0.35 (+0.91%)
Volume$14.16K
Net Assets58.03M
iShares US Telecommunications ETF
Price$27.29
Change+$0.25 (+0.92%)
Volume$337.4K
Net Assets542.05M
FDCF vs IYZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDCF vs. IYZ commentary
Jan 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCF is a Hold and IYZ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYZ has more net assets: 542M vs. FDCF (58M). FDCF has a higher annual dividend yield than IYZ: FDCF (3.200) vs IYZ (1.715). FDCF was incepted earlier than IYZ: FDCF (5 years) vs IYZ (25 years). IYZ has a higher turnover FDCF (17.00) vs FDCF (17.00).
| FDCF | IYZ | FDCF / IYZ | |
| Gain YTD | 3.200 | 1.715 | 187% |
| Net Assets | 58M | 542M | 11% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 17.00 | 24.00 | 71% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 2.27 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDCF | IYZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 84% | 11 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 11 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 81% | 11 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 90% | 16 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 66% | 12 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | +0.91% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -1.53% | ||
| CDNS - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | +2.39% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 66% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| SNPS - FDCF | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.11% | ||
More | ||||
IYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYZ has been closely correlated with CMCSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYZ jumps, then CMCSA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IYZ | 100% | +0.92% | ||
| CMCSA - IYZ | 71% Closely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| CSCO - IYZ | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| CHTR - IYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| LBRDK - IYZ | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| LBRDA - IYZ | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
More | ||||