Ad is loading...
FDCF vs IYZ
FDCF vs IYZ Comparison
Open Charts FDCF vs IYZ
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$35.56
Change-$1.93 (-5.15%)
Volume$10.51K
Net Assets63.95M
iShares US Telecommunications ETF
Price$26.49
Change-$1.11 (-4.02%)
Volume$1.45M
Net Assets374.11M
FDCF vs IYZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDCF vs. IYZ commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCF is a Buy and IYZ is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYZ has more net assets: 374M vs. FDCF (63.9M). IYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than FDCF: IYZ (-0.647) vs FDCF (-5.849). FDCF was incepted earlier than IYZ: FDCF (5 years) vs IYZ (25 years). IYZ (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than FDCF (0.50). FDCF has a higher turnover IYZ (30.00) vs IYZ (30.00).
| FDCF | IYZ | FDCF / IYZ | |
| Gain YTD | -5.849 | -0.647 | 903% |
| Net Assets | 63.9M | 374M | 17% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.40 | 125% |
| Turnover | 35.00 | 30.00 | 117% |
| Yield | 0.07 | 1.99 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDCF | IYZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 72% | 8 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | -5.13% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -7.64% | ||
| CDNS - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -6.05% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -8.98% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 66% Closely correlated | -11.09% | ||
| SNPS - FDCF | 65% Loosely correlated | -4.74% | ||
More | ||||
IYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYZ has been closely correlated with CMCSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYZ jumps, then CMCSA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IYZ | 100% | -4.02% | ||
| CMCSA - IYZ | 71% Closely correlated | -2.43% | ||
| LITE - IYZ | 61% Loosely correlated | -20.01% | ||
| CIEN - IYZ | 61% Loosely correlated | -13.59% | ||
| CSCO - IYZ | 61% Loosely correlated | -6.68% | ||
| UI - IYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | -10.81% | ||
More | ||||