32 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
FDCF vs SNPS
FDCF vs SNPS Comparison
Open Charts FDCF vs SNPS
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$38.98
Change+$0.35 (+0.91%)
Volume$14.16K
Net Assets58.03M
Synopsys
Price$526.70
Change+$10.89 (+2.11%)
Volume$1.24M
Capitalization87.98B
FDCF vs SNPS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDCF vs. SNPS commentary
Jan 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCF is a Hold and SNPS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SNPS: Fundamental Ratings
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDCF | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 84% | 11 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 11 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 81% | 11 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 90% | 13 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 66% | 17 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | +0.91% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -1.53% | ||
| CDNS - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | +2.39% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 66% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| SNPS - FDCF | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.11% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | +2.11% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 86% Closely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| ANSS - SNPS | 77% Closely correlated | +1.60% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.49% | ||
| MSFT - SNPS | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| CLSK - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | +6.17% | ||
More | ||||