Ad is loading...
FDEWX vs RBEMX
FDEWX vs RBEMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDEWX vs. RBEMX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDEWX is a Hold and RBEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBEMX has more cash in the bank: 24.1B vs. FDEWX (15B). FDEWX pays higher dividends than RBEMX: FDEWX (1.98) vs RBEMX (0.50). FDEWX was incepted earlier than RBEMX: FDEWX (14 years) vs RBEMX (11 years). RBEMX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FDEWX (0.12). FDEWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 8.00 vs. RBEMX (5.00). FDEWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBEMX: FDEWX (0) vs RBEMX (250). FDEWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.46 vs. RBEMX (5.08). FDEWX return over 5 years is better than : 63.85 vs. RBEMX (39.52).
| FDEWX | RBEMX | FDEWX / RBEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.12 | 1.19 | 10% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.12 | 1.19 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.328 | -1.682 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15B | 24.1B | 62% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 0.50 | 397% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.46 | 5.08 | 186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.44 | 16.73 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.85 | 39.52 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.98 | 56.64 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers