Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDFAX vs RYCIX
FDFAX vs RYCIX Comparison
Open Charts FDFAX vs RYCIX
FDFAX vs RYCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDFAX vs. RYCIX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDFAX is a Buy and RYCIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDFAX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. RYCIX (30.3M). FDFAX pays higher dividends than RYCIX: FDFAX (1.79) vs RYCIX (1.41). FDFAX was incepted earlier than RYCIX: FDFAX (41 years) vs RYCIX (28 years). RYCIX (1.43) is less costly to investors than FDFAX (0.68). FDFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RYCIX (45.00). FDFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCIX: FDFAX (0) vs RYCIX (2500). RYCIX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDFAX: RYCIX (1000) vs FDFAX (500). FDFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.31 vs. RYCIX (-13.51). FDFAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.39 vs. RYCIX (-33.72).
| FDFAX | RYCIX | FDFAX / RYCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.38 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.43 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.978 | 8.017 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.22B | 30.3M | 4,036% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.41 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.31 | -13.51 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.52 | -23.23 | 7% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.39 | -33.72 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.19 | -31.93 | -16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers