Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDFAX vs RYCIX
FDFAX vs RYCIX Comparison
Open Charts FDFAX vs RYCIX
FDFAX vs RYCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDFAX vs. RYCIX commentary
Aug 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDFAX is a Buy and RYCIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDFAX has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. RYCIX (30.6M). FDFAX pays higher dividends than RYCIX: FDFAX (1.74) vs RYCIX (1.39). FDFAX was incepted earlier than RYCIX: FDFAX (41 years) vs RYCIX (28 years). RYCIX (1.43) is less costly to investors than FDFAX (0.68). FDFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RYCIX (45.00). FDFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCIX: FDFAX (0) vs RYCIX (2500). RYCIX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDFAX: RYCIX (1000) vs FDFAX (500). FDFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.13 vs. RYCIX (-11.02). FDFAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.28 vs. RYCIX (-32.63).
| FDFAX | RYCIX | FDFAX / RYCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.38 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.43 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.678 | 9.978 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 30.6M | 4,088% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 1.39 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.13 | -11.02 | -83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.96 | -19.26 | -21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.28 | -32.63 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.28 | -30.03 | -31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers