Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDFTX vs RBFTX
FDFTX vs RBFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDFTX vs. RBFTX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDFTX is a Hold and RBFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDFTX (49.4B) and RBFTX (49.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FDFTX pays higher dividends than RBFTX: FDFTX (1.98) vs RBFTX (0.98). FDFTX was incepted earlier than RBFTX: FDFTX (8 years) vs RBFTX (18 years). RBFTX (1.43) is less costly to investors than FDFTX (0.34). FDFTX (7.00) and RBFTX (7.00) have comparable annual turnover. RBFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDFTX: RBFTX (250) vs FDFTX (1000000). FDFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.67 vs. RBFTX (6.40). FDFTX return over 5 years is better than : 40.75 vs. RBFTX (34.70).
| FDFTX | RBFTX | FDFTX / RBFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.43 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.43 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.692 | 3.203 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.4B | 49.4B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 0.98 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.67 | 6.40 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.21 | 19.98 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.75 | 34.70 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers