Ad is loading...
FDFTX vs RHFTX
FDFTX vs RHFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDFTX vs. RHFTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDFTX is a Hold and RHFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDFTX (48B) and RHFTX (48B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FDFTX pays higher dividends than RHFTX: FDFTX (1.99) vs RHFTX (1.86). FDFTX was incepted earlier than RHFTX: FDFTX (8 years) vs RHFTX (9 years). RHFTX (0.48) is less costly to investors than FDFTX (0.34). RHFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDFTX: RHFTX (250) vs FDFTX (1000000). FDFTX (6.68) and RHFTX (6.57) have marching annual gain over last year. FDFTX (37.69) and RHFTX (36.96) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FDFTX | RHFTX | FDFTX / RHFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.48 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.48 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.475 | 0.424 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48B | 48B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 1.86 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.68 | 6.57 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.66 | 16.31 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.69 | 36.96 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...