Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDKLX vs RCNTX
FDKLX vs RCNTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDKLX vs. RCNTX commentary
May 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDKLX is a Hold and RCNTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCNTX has more cash in the bank: 15.9B vs. FDKLX (8.82B). FDKLX pays higher dividends than RCNTX: FDKLX (1.93) vs RCNTX (0.58). FDKLX was incepted earlier than RCNTX: FDKLX (11 years) vs RCNTX (10 years). RCNTX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FDKLX (0.12). FDKLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. RCNTX (5.00). FDKLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCNTX: FDKLX (0) vs RCNTX (250). FDKLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.88 vs. RCNTX (7.73). FDKLX return over 5 years is better than : 72.14 vs. RCNTX (48.33).
| FDKLX | RCNTX | FDKLX / RCNTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.12 | 1.03 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.12 | 1.03 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.198 | 3.235 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.82B | 15.9B | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 0.58 | 335% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.88 | 7.73 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.91 | 28.61 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.14 | 48.33 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.78 | 80.90 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers