Ad is loading...
FDKLX vs RCNTX
FDKLX vs RCNTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDKLX vs. RCNTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDKLX is a Hold and RCNTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCNTX has more cash in the bank: 15B vs. FDKLX (8.65B). FDKLX pays higher dividends than RCNTX: FDKLX (1.95) vs RCNTX (0.58). FDKLX was incepted earlier than RCNTX: FDKLX (11 years) vs RCNTX (10 years). RCNTX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FDKLX (0.12). FDKLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. RCNTX (5.00). FDKLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCNTX: FDKLX (0) vs RCNTX (250). FDKLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.45 vs. RCNTX (5.25). FDKLX return over 5 years is better than : 64.00 vs. RCNTX (42.79).
| FDKLX | RCNTX | FDKLX / RCNTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.12 | 1.03 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.12 | 1.03 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.331 | -1.816 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.65B | 15B | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 0.58 | 334% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.45 | 5.25 | 180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.41 | 18.12 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.00 | 42.79 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.95 | 72.05 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...