Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDKLX vs RCNTX
FDKLX vs RCNTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDKLX vs. RCNTX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDKLX is a Hold and RCNTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCNTX has more cash in the bank: 16.4B vs. FDKLX (9.41B). FDKLX pays higher dividends than RCNTX: FDKLX (1.86) vs RCNTX (0.55). FDKLX was incepted earlier than RCNTX: FDKLX (11 years) vs RCNTX (10 years). RCNTX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FDKLX (0.12). FDKLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. RCNTX (5.00). FDKLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCNTX: FDKLX (0) vs RCNTX (250). FDKLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.85 vs. RCNTX (9.43). FDKLX return over 5 years is better than : 68.54 vs. RCNTX (47.90).
| FDKLX | RCNTX | FDKLX / RCNTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.12 | 1.03 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.12 | 1.03 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.684 | 6.470 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.41B | 16.4B | 57% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 0.55 | 341% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.85 | 9.43 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.94 | 39.85 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.54 | 47.90 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.79 | 87.30 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement