Ad is loading...
FDKPX vs RCNTX
FDKPX vs RCNTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDKPX vs. RCNTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDKPX is a Hold and RCNTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCNTX has more cash in the bank: 15B vs. FDKPX (672M). FDKPX pays higher dividends than RCNTX: FDKPX (1.12) vs RCNTX (0.58). FDKPX was incepted earlier than RCNTX: FDKPX (11 years) vs RCNTX (10 years). RCNTX (1.03) and FDKPX (1.01) have similar cost to investors . FDKPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. RCNTX (5.00). FDKPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCNTX: FDKPX (0) vs RCNTX (250). FDKPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.59 vs. RCNTX (5.48). RCNTX return over 5 years is better than : 44.50 vs. FDKPX (40.90).
| FDKPX | RCNTX | FDKPX / RCNTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.03 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.03 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.730 | -1.362 | -54% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 672M | 15B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.58 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.59 | 5.48 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.34 | 18.67 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.90 | 44.50 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.49 | 72.84 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers