Ad is loading...
FDKQX vs RCNTX
FDKQX vs RCNTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDKQX vs. RCNTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDKQX is a Hold and RCNTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCNTX has more cash in the bank: 15B vs. FDKQX (672M). RCNTX pays higher dividends than FDKQX: RCNTX (0.58) vs FDKQX (0.00). FDKQX was incepted earlier than RCNTX: FDKQX (11 years) vs RCNTX (10 years). RCNTX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FDKQX (0.76). FDKQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. RCNTX (5.00). FDKQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCNTX: FDKQX (0) vs RCNTX (250). FDKQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.80 vs. RCNTX (5.48). RCNTX (44.50) and FDKQX (42.38) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FDKQX | RCNTX | FDKQX / RCNTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.03 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.03 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.786 | -1.362 | -58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 672M | 15B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.58 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.80 | 5.48 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.23 | 18.67 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.38 | 44.50 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.58 | 72.84 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers