Ad is loading...
FDKSX vs RCNTX
FDKSX vs RCNTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDKSX vs. RCNTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDKSX is a Hold and RCNTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCNTX has more cash in the bank: 15B vs. FDKSX (672M). FDKSX (0.60) and RCNTX (0.58) have matching dividends . FDKSX was incepted earlier than RCNTX: FDKSX (11 years) vs RCNTX (10 years). FDKSX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RCNTX (1.03). FDKSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. RCNTX (5.00). FDKSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCNTX: FDKSX (0) vs RCNTX (250). FDKSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.75 vs. RCNTX (5.48). RCNTX return over 5 years is better than : 44.50 vs. FDKSX (36.00).
| FDKSX | RCNTX | FDKSX / RCNTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 1.03 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 1.03 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.446 | -1.362 | -33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 672M | 15B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.58 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.75 | 5.48 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.57 | 18.67 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.00 | 44.50 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.67 | 72.84 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers