Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDLS vs IWR
FDLS vs IWR Comparison
Open Charts FDLS vs IWR
Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF
Price$31.43
Change-$0.45 (-1.41%)
Volume$6.84K
Net Assets92.45M
iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF
Price$92.39
Change-$1.32 (-1.41%)
Volume$2.04M
Net Assets43.09B
FDLS vs IWR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDLS vs. IWR commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDLS is a Hold and IWR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWR has more net assets: 43.1B vs. FDLS (92.5M). FDLS has a higher annual dividend yield than IWR: FDLS (7.215) vs IWR (5.141). FDLS was incepted earlier than IWR: FDLS (3 years) vs IWR (24 years). IWR (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than FDLS (0.69). FDLS has a higher turnover IWR (11.00) vs IWR (11.00).
| FDLS | IWR | FDLS / IWR | |
| Gain YTD | 7.215 | 5.141 | 140% |
| Net Assets | 92.5M | 43.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.19 | 363% |
| Turnover | 232.00 | 11.00 | 2,109% |
| Yield | 0.70 | 1.30 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDLS | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 11 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDLS has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDLS jumps, then SF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDLS | 100% | -1.41% | ||
| SF - FDLS | 75% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| ENVA - FDLS | 72% Closely correlated | -3.83% | ||
| TOL - FDLS | 71% Closely correlated | +3.00% | ||
| QTWO - FDLS | 66% Loosely correlated | -5.75% | ||
| CAT - FDLS | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.13% | ||
More | ||||