FDRR vs TROW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDRR is a StrongBuy and TROW is a Hold.
TROW | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FDRR | TROW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 12 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 56% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| STMMX | 36.10 | -0.34 | -0.93% |
| Sterling Capital Real Estate A | |||
| IPFPX | 51.53 | -0.63 | -1.21% |
| Poplar Forest Partners Institutional | |||
| VMCCX | 50.71 | -0.72 | -1.40% |
| Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core C | |||
| KLGNX | 47.67 | -1.16 | -2.38% |
| NYLI WMC Growth Investor Class | |||
| FAGOX | 179.18 | -5.49 | -2.97% |
| Fidelity Advisor Growth Opps M | |||
FDRR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDRR has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDRR jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDRR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDRR | 100% | -1.32% | ||
| TROW - FDRR | 68% Closely correlated | -2.05% | ||
| PRU - FDRR | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| STWD - FDRR | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| TXN - FDRR | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| GS - FDRR | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.59% | ||
More | ||||
TROW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TROW has been closely correlated with SEIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TROW jumps, then SEIC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TROW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TROW | 100% | -2.05% | ||
| SEIC - TROW | 68% Closely correlated | -2.42% | ||
| PFG - TROW | 67% Closely correlated | -2.52% | ||
| APAM - TROW | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.92% | ||
| IVZ - TROW | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| JHG - TROW | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
More | ||||