78 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
FDTS vs HBM
FDTS vs HBM Comparison
Open Charts FDTS vs HBM
First Trust DevMkts exUS SC AlphaDEX®ETF
Price$42.08
Change+$0.23 (+0.55%)
Volume$172
Net Assets6.27M
Hudbay Minerals
Price$7.10
Change-$0.51 (-6.70%)
Volume$8.32M
Capitalization2.45B
FDTS vs HBM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTS vs. HBM commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTS is a Hold and HBM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBM: Fundamental Ratings
HBM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HBM | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MFEBX | 50.45 | -0.38 | -0.75% |
| MFS Value B | |||
| GITRX | 13.31 | -0.11 | -0.82% |
| Goldman Sachs International T/M Eq Inv | |||
| SUPCX | 18.45 | -0.25 | -1.34% |
| DWS Equity Sector Strategy Fund Class C | |||
| MGGPX | 35.20 | -0.79 | -2.20% |
| Morgan Stanley Inst Global Opp A | |||
| IYSYX | 18.32 | -0.43 | -2.29% |
| Macquarie Smid Cap Core Fund Class Y | |||
FDTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDTS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDTS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDTS | 100% | N/A | ||
| MT - FDTS | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| HBM - FDTS | 57% Loosely correlated | -6.70% | ||
| CE - FDTS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| APAM - FDTS | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.92% | ||
| CTS - FDTS | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.31% | ||
More | ||||
HBM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBM has been closely correlated with LUNMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBM jumps, then LUNMF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HBM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBM | 100% | -6.70% | ||
| LUNMF - HBM | 81% Closely correlated | -7.86% | ||
| FCX - HBM | 80% Closely correlated | -5.08% | ||
| SCCO - HBM | 77% Closely correlated | -5.02% | ||
| TGB - HBM | 75% Closely correlated | -8.48% | ||
| TECK - HBM | 74% Closely correlated | -5.14% | ||
More | ||||