32 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
FDTS vs HBM
FDTS vs HBM Comparison
Open Charts FDTS vs HBM
First Trust DevMkts exUS SC AlphaDEX®ETF
Price$39.95
Change+$0.97 (+2.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.02M
Hudbay Minerals
Price$8.59
Change-$0.05 (-0.58%)
Volume$4.54M
Capitalization2.45B
FDTS vs HBM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTS vs. HBM commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTS is a Hold and HBM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBM: Fundamental Ratings
HBM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDTS | HBM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 70% | 11 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 77% | 11 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 72% | 11 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 72% | 11 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 71% | 11 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 17 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 73% | 20 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDTS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDTS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDTS | 100% | N/A | ||
| MT - FDTS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| HBM - FDTS | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| CE - FDTS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| APAM - FDTS | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| CTS - FDTS | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
More | ||||
HBM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBM has been closely correlated with LUNMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBM jumps, then LUNMF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HBM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBM | 100% | -0.58% | ||
| LUNMF - HBM | 81% Closely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| FCX - HBM | 80% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| SCCO - HBM | 80% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| TECK - HBM | 77% Closely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| TGB - HBM | 77% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||