Ad is loading...
FDTS vs ISVL
FDTS vs ISVL Comparison
Open Charts FDTS vs ISVL
First Trust DevMkts exUS SC AlphaDEX®ETF
Price$39.95
Change+$0.97 (+2.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.02M
iShares Intl Dev Sm Cp Val Fctr ETF
Price$34.40
Change+$0.15 (+0.44%)
Volume$1.73K
Net Assets181.84M
FDTS vs ISVL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTS vs. ISVL commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTS is a Hold and ISVL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ISVL has more net assets: 182M vs. FDTS (6.03M). ISVL has a higher annual dividend yield than FDTS: ISVL (0.295) vs FDTS (-1.432). FDTS was incepted earlier than ISVL: FDTS (13 years) vs ISVL (4 years). FDTS has a higher turnover ISVL (18.00) vs ISVL (18.00).
| FDTS | ISVL | FDTS / ISVL | |
| Gain YTD | -1.432 | 0.295 | -486% |
| Net Assets | 6.03M | 182M | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 124.00 | 18.00 | 689% |
| Yield | 3.02 | 3.69 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDTS | ISVL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 70% | 11 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 77% | 11 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 72% | 11 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 72% | 11 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 71% | 11 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 73% | 11 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 89% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDTS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDTS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDTS | 100% | N/A | ||
| MT - FDTS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| HBM - FDTS | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| CE - FDTS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| APAM - FDTS | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| CTS - FDTS | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
More | ||||
ISVL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ISVL and CELC have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISVL and CELC's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ISVL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISVL | 100% | +0.41% | ||
| CELC - ISVL | 18% Poorly correlated | -2.84% | ||
| CE - ISVL | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.99% | ||
| IDR - ISVL | 10% Poorly correlated | +5.26% | ||
| CARM - ISVL | 10% Poorly correlated | -3.46% | ||
| MOVE - ISVL | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.92% | ||
More | ||||