Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDYZX vs RGACX
FDYZX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FDYZX vs RGACX
FDYZX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDYZX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDYZX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FDYZX (28.1B). FDYZX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FDYZX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FDYZX (18 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FDYZX (0.52). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDYZX (29.61). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDYZX: RGACX (250) vs FDYZX (100000). FDYZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.08 vs. RGACX (-1.13). FDYZX return over 5 years is better than : 22.48 vs. RGACX (8.33).
| FDYZX | RGACX | FDYZX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.93 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.93 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.257 | 3.589 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.1B | 357B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.08 | -1.13 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.65 | 32.42 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.48 | 8.33 | 270% |
| Returns for 10 years | 303.32 | 91.18 | 333% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement