Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDYZX vs RGACX
FDYZX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FDYZX vs RGACX
FDYZX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDYZX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDYZX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FDYZX (29B). FDYZX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FDYZX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FDYZX (18 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FDYZX (0.52). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDYZX (29.61). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDYZX: RGACX (250) vs FDYZX (100000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.65 vs. FDYZX (-0.09). FDYZX return over 5 years is better than : 23.73 vs. RGACX (11.29).
| FDYZX | RGACX | FDYZX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.93 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.93 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.864 | 9.283 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29B | 353B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.09 | 0.65 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.34 | 40.37 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.73 | 11.29 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 311.04 | 99.04 | 314% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement