Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDYZX vs RGAFX
FDYZX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FDYZX vs RGAFX
Franklin DynaTech Adv
Price$198.29
Change+$1.42 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.31B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$81.83
Change+$0.66 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets319.43B
FDYZX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDYZX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDYZX is a Buy and RGAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 319B vs. FDYZX (27.3B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FDYZX: RGAFX (0.61) vs FDYZX (0.00). FDYZX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FDYZX (17 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). FDYZX (0.54) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FDYZX (11.94). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDYZX: RGAFX (250) vs FDYZX (100000). FDYZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.88 vs. RGAFX (11.03). FDYZX return over 5 years is better than : 81.15 vs. RGAFX (56.40).
| FDYZX | RGAFX | FDYZX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.34 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.34 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.414 | 9.957 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.3B | 319B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.88 | 11.03 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 91.62 | 57.61 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.15 | 56.40 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 292.96 | 86.15 | 340% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement